Skip to main content
rmr-logo

Advisor's Note


Research Notes

Strategy

Economics

  • In February, consumer prices met consensus expectations. Headline CPI rose 0.3% following a 0.2% increase the month prior. Excluding food and energy, prices advanced by 0.2%, rising 2.5% over the last year. Two things worth noting: 1) CPI was on an improved track ahead of the conflict with Iran, 2) There is an increasing wedge between CPI and PCE as shelter inflation cools. The Fed cannot ease when PCE inflation data look worse, and in that sense while Wednesday's data is encouraging on the surface, it may well push the Fed off a little bit further. 
  • Monetary policy hawks are concerned about second order inflation effects from this latest negative supply shock. Neil understands the concern, but finds them to be unfounded, digging into them below.
    • Consumers lack the wherewithal to absorb higher prices. The latest Beige Book noted "most Districts received reports of some firms holding selling prices stable despite higher costs because their customers were increasingly price sensitive". Wage growth is continues to cool as well, implying ongoing slowing.
    • Productivity growth has been improving recently. Nonfarm business productivity growth has been close to 3% on average for the last 3 years. Latest data from SF Fed shows a set up in total factor productivity. The important story here is it's tough to worry about negative supply shocks as productivity appears to be strengthening.
    • Consumer credit growth remains relatively sluggish. Over the last year, consumer credit outstanding has climbed just 2.2%. Consumers aren't upbeat on the future either, with NY Fed's Survey of Consumer Expectations revealing that consumers see hardest credit availability for the year ahead since may 2025. There is no household credit boom.
    • Inflation expectations appear to be anchored. The Atlanta Fed's Business Inflation Expectations Survey shows median expected change to unit costs next 12 months at just 1.9%, right around pre-COVID levels. Households have shown improvement, but we put more weight on firms since they are the price setters and incorporate a wider range of information when forming their views around inflation.
  • The inflation risk from the energy shock is less important than the growth shock. Inflation ultimately boils down to a household's budget constraint. As a result, the shock households will feel from rising energy prices will squeeze disposable incomes, forcing spending cuts elsewhere. Businesses cannot raise prices in that environment without feeling a deeper squeeze themselves.
  • Neil has been cautious on labor for a while and February's data confirms his priors. February was a bad month, and January was a better month.
 
Asset Allocation Model

Screenshot 2026-03-13 120751
 
 
Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259
Sector Ranks Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259 Screenshot 2026-03-13 120722 Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259 Chart of the weekScreenshot 2025-03-27 095259We believe the focus on US/Iran is warranted, but it's one component of several signs of deterioration that started well before military engagement. Notably, we have not seen a firm breadth day in weeks, and Tuesday's modest weakness had an unusual 38% advancers. Credit was deteriorating before US/Iran and acts like an annoying tooth-ache.
Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259
Screenshot 2026-03-13 104421 
 
RenMac Off-Script Podcast
3-12-26RenMac
  

Research Notes

Economics

  • US labor market continues its downtrend. Weekly job postings continue to trend down, layoffs picking up, quits are cooling.

  • March data showed broad economic weakness, with declines in services, confidence, housing, and commercial real estate.

  • Rising inflation, weakening job outlooks, and cautious business spending point to growing economic strain.

  • Home prices are cooling, which may curb spending as household wealth dips and the savings rate edges higher.

  • The rebound in capital goods shipments looks fragile, with growth mostly tied to tech and broader investment plans weakening.

  • New tariffs could cut 0.5% from GDP, strain trade ties, and raise car prices before production shifts take effect.

  • Auto repossessions are at their highest since 2009, and tariffs may push buyers to the used market, keeping prices elevated.

  • Despite trade tensions, signs of de-escalation and strong profits offer some cushion, with markets already pricing in much of the downside.

  • Q4 growth was lifted by consumer and government spending, but with investment falling and key supports fading, a broader slowdown seems likely.

Strategy

  • Market technicals show potential for a rebound. We think Mag7 approaches 50dma and potentially crosses through, getting to overbought, high beta stocks slowly recovering, and excessive outflows in IWM and SPY could fuel a tactical bounce.
     
    • Remember, this was a beta-driven correction, not a momentum-driven one.

  • Bullish signals may re-emerge if a high percentage of stocks move about their 20dma and hit 20-day highs, suggesting a reassertion of the bull trend.

  • Despite heightened policy uncertainty and a dark cross in tech, strong credit markets and sentiment tied to returns suggest the current pessimism may be overdone.

  • Semi's continue to weaken, with even "good" ones coming under pressure.

  • Staples pulled back at resistance levels, maintaining relative downtrend. Sharp unwind in beta and extreme underperformance suggests continued downward pressure.

  • Transports reiterate bearish trend but flagging oversold and in "seller's frenzy". Expect short-term tactical bounce but fade the move.

Policy

  • Debt limit deadline ("X-Date") likely between July and October, with resolution hinging on reconciliation or bipartisan deal amid uncertain cash flows.
     
    • Delays risk market volatility and a Moody's downgrade, raising U.S. borrowing costs.

  • Trump will announce reciprocal tariffs on April 2, targeting about 15 key partners; recent moves on oil, autos, and threats to the EU and Canada may be strategic leverage.

  • Section 232 is being used more broadly to justify tariffs on national security grounds, covering autos, copper, timber, and pharma, with an emphasis on U.S. production.

  • Tariff timing and scope remain unclear, with Trump using them as a flexible tool, adding to market uncertainty.
 
Asset Allocation Model
Screenshot 2025-03-27 152550 Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259 Sector Ranks Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259 Screenshot 2025-03-27 152712 Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259 Chart of the week Screenshot 2025-03-27 095259 Screenshot 2025-03-22 134002

 

This information does not constitute an offer to buy or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any service, security or any other financial instrument in any jurisdiction. It is not the endorsement of any particular investment, or an official confirmation of any transaction. Renaissance Macro Securities, LLC (“RenMac”) does not represent this information to be complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. RenMac and/or its officers, employees and affiliates may from time to time acquire, hold or sell a position in the securities mentioned herein. Any comments or statements contained herein do not necessarily reflect those of RenMac, its employees and its affiliates. Buy or sell orders or any other instructions cannot be accepted by email and will not be acted upon. The confidentiality of internet email cannot be guaranteed. Your message may be read by persons other than the intended recipient. This communication may contain information that is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any copying, distribution or use of this communication or information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the message from your computer. This email is the property of RenMac and RenMac does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this message which may arise as a result of transmission. RenMac archives and reviews incoming and outgoing email. Emails and attachments may be produced at the request of any regulator. Renaissance Macro Securities, LLC, Member FINRA & SIPC.

Steve Pavlick

  • House Republicans plan to introduce a Continuing Resolution this weekend to fund the government through September 30, with a vote expected midweek before the House adjourns on March 12. With government funding set to expire on March 14, lawmakers face a tight timeline to avoid a shutdown.
  • The CR is expected to maintain current funding levels while delaying potential budget cuts to the fiscal year 2026 process. The White House has requested several spending "anomalies", including $30 billion in Pentagon transfer authority and $100 billion in defense spending. Sequestration concerns have been raised, but verbal assurances suggest a CR through September would prevent automatic funding cuts under the Fiscal Responsibility Act.
  • House Republicans aim to pass the CR with minimal Democratic support, relying on their slim majority despite some GOP opposition. Speaker Johnson has backing from President Trump, but Democrats, led by Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, have opposed the plan, calling it partisan. Some Democratic lawmakers advocate for a shorter CR to allow further negotiations, while others fear a shutdown would harm government employees and essential services.
  • With deep divisions over the CR, presidential spending authority, and DOGE-driven budget reductions, the risk of a government shutdown remains high. If no deal is reached, a shutdown could begin on March 15 but may not fully impact operations until March 17. The longer the standoff continues, the harder it will be for either side to compromise without political consequences, increasing the likelihood of a prolonged shutdown.
  • On March 5th, Elon Musk met with House and Senate Republicans, where Senate GOP members urged him to have the White House propose a recissions package for congressional approval on funds identified as wasteful by DOGE. This approach would allow Congress 45 days to vote on rescinding funds with a simple Senate majority, avoiding legal battles over President Trump's authority to freeze congressional appropriations. A similar 2018 attempt failed when two GOP Senators joined Democrats to block it.
  • The Trump administration may prefer a legal challenge, betting that a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court would expand presidential authority over spending. However, if the Court rules against them, it could limit Trump's power before the 2026 midterms, when Republican control of Congress could change. Additionally, some GOP lawmakers may hesitate to vote for recissions so close to the elections, making the passage uncertain.